
Rating: A
I may be a succor for allegoric film, but so is the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences who chose the film for best picture this year, along with No Country for Old Men. Really good allegories make you scratch your head, and often interpret your own translation. I have this knack for discovering symbols, but no skill in interpreting them. Here are some that I noticed.
At nearly every moment in the film where you should have been cringing with disgust, you found yourself in hysterics. This thematic fusion of opposites is abundant within There Will Be Blood.
Take for example the two lead characters. Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) is the prime industrialist. Paul / Eli Sunday (Paul Dano) is the model charismatic preacher. The film acts as a mirror which reflects these opposites, and by so doing compares them.
Another example is the two contrasting musical choices. First were dark and eerie compositions by Radiohead guitarist Jonny Greenwood (which reminded me of minimalist Philip Glass). Second was one of my top ten classical pieces, Violin Concerto in D Major by Johannes Brahms. Not only were the musical selections well qualified, but perfectly positioned as to amplify this theme of opposites. For example, Brahms’ concerto is amazingly uplifting, yet the two times it is played is after the two darkest moments of the film. The opening scene of the movie opens with Greenwood’s screeching violins during a still shot of the desert. It sets the stage for the dualism to come.
I wouldn’t agree with the theory that this is an anti-religion / anti-industrialism message-movie. I hate movies like that, and just because the two characters are very bad, doesn’t suggest their choice of profession is the reason for their corruption. In fact, many movies of this type stay far away from a clear cut message. They show, they don’t preach.
There are two unforgettable scenes, which could have been successful independent mini-movies - and which also illustrate this thematic dichotomy which is carried throughout. First is the baptism of Plainview. Second is the last scene of the movie. Not only are they hilarious, but insanely disturbing. The shear entertainment value is beyond compare, but intellectually stimulating as well. I won’t spoil too much, but notice how they are inverses of each other. Then ask yourself why.
Who will get the Oscar?
Dang good question. I’ve seen 4 out of the 5 nominees, but I believe the race will be between There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men. I’m always biased toward the film I just saw, so I currently lean toward Blood. Interestingly enough, they are both based off novels: There Will Be Blood - Upton Sinclair’s Oil! And No Country for Old Men - Cormac McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men. Also, they are both apolitical and amoral. That’s a stark contrast between the 78th Annual where it was between Crash (racism message-movie) and Brokeback Mountain (homosexual message-movie).